Comparison of Microscopy, Culture and Molecular Methods for Diagnosing Gonorrhea
Abhishek Lachyan
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sumathi Muralidhar *
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka Verma
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Santhosh Rajan
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Devanshi Sharma
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Naveen Joshi
Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Niti Khunger
Department of Dermatology & STD and Apex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Gonorrhea, a sexually transmitted infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, continues to be a significant global public health concern. The timely and accurate diagnosis of this infectious disease is crucial for its effective management. Traditional methods, especially culture, were historically considered the gold standard for diagnosing gonorrhea. However, the introduction of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), such as Real-Time PCR, has revolutionized diagnostic approaches. Currently, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends NAAT as the primary diagnostic method, with culture reserved for specific cases, particularly for testing antimicrobial susceptibility in instances of suspected treatment failure. The International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) provides guidelines for the use of NAAT or culture, depending on clinical scenarios. This study conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of various diagnostic methods at the Apex Regional STD Centre in New Delhi, India, spanning from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Culture, Real-Time PCR, and smear examination were compared for the diagnosis of gonorrhea. A total of 33 samples were included in the analysis, with the following percentages: culture (92.02%), PCR (100%), and smear examination (100%). An intriguing finding was that 7.98% of samples were culture-negative but PCR-positive, highlighting a significant disparity between the two methods. This observation underscores the limitations of relying solely on culture for gonorrhea diagnosis and the potential consequences, including treatment delays, disease transmission, and the development of antibiotic-resistant strains. In summary, this study underscores the critical need for accurate and reliable diagnostic methods for gonorrhea. It emphasizes the evolving diagnostic landscape, with NAATs emerging as essential tools. The findings from multiple studies stress the complementary roles of different diagnostic methods and the necessity of adapting to evolving diagnostic techniques. This research highlights the importance of collaborative approaches to enhance accuracy and address the evolving challenges of gonorrhea diagnosis. Ultimately, the significance of laboratory testing extends beyond individual patient care to broader public health goals and the prevention of sexually transmitted infections.
Keywords: Gonorrhea, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAAT), real-time PCR, culture, smear examination, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, confirmatory testing, diagnostic methods, public health
How to Cite
References
Abou Tayoun AN, Burchard PR, Caliendo AM, Scherer A, Tsongalis GJ. A multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2015;98(2):214–218. Available:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0014480015000131
Bromhead C, Miller A, Jones M, Whiley D. Comparison of the cobas 4800 CT/NG Test with Culture for Detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genital and Nongenital Specimens in a Low-Prevalence Population in New Zealand. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(5):1505–1509. Available:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JCM.03223-12.
Jahan F, Shamsuzzaman SM, Akter S. Diagnosis of common bacterial causes of urethritis in men by Gram stain, culture, and multiplex PCR. Malaysian Journal of Pathology. 2014;36(3):175-180.
Sood S, Verma R, Mir SS, others. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for gonorrhea diagnosis in women: Experience of a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res. 140:649-652.
Ouzounova-Raykova V, Jordanov D, El-Tibi M, Mitov I. Gonococcal infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic persons seeking medical clinics in Sofia--a 3-year study. 2008-2010. APMIS, 119:864-7.
Młynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., de Walthoffen SW, Mlynarczyk G, Malejczyk M, Majewski S. (n.d.). Comparison of the real-time PCR method and bacterial culture in the laboratory diagnosis of gonorrhea in patients of the Department of Dermatology and Venereology of the Medical University of Warsaw.
Han Y, Yin YP, Shi MQ, Zheng BJ, Zhong MY, Jiang N, Wang B. Evaluation of abbott real time CT/NG assay for detection of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical swabs from female sex workers in China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e89658.
Skulskal E, Młynarczyk-Bonikowska B, Walter de Walthoffen S, Młynarczyk G, Malejczyk M, Majewski S. Comparison of Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in laboratory diagnostics of gonorrhoea in patients of the Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw] Med Dosw Microbiol. 2015;67(1):29-38. PMID: 26084073.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014. MMWR. Recommendations and Reports. 2014;63(RR-02):1–19.
Meyer T, Buder S. The laboratory diagnosis of neisseria gonorrhoeae: Current testing and future demands. Pathogens. 2020;9(2):91. Available:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/2/91
Gonorrhea workup." Medscape; 2023. Available:https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/218059-workup.